Monotheism and Polytheism – pros and cons

Monotheism is authoritarian – if there is only one god, and only one correct way to understand his will, then there is only one correct way to act regarding the things god finds important. If there are rival suggestions of the correct way to act in these areas, both sides will feel a religious duty to force the other side to change their behavior, and preferably their opinions. This leads to religious police, religious inquisitions, religious wars.

Only One God - bearded dude up in the sky with a whole bunch of what look like lesser gods

Monotheism results in a very focused society, with absolute values and unquestioning support – until a flaw appears, opposition appears, and war breaks out. Monotheism is inherently hostile to democracy and free choice.

It is easier to manage a theocracy for a population that is ethnically and culturally homogenous. The wider it grows, the more allowances have to be made, and the faster the monotheism erodes. The most effective monotheisms are cults operating in isolated compounds.

Polytheism allows the possibility of behaving in different ways, each way being appropriate for a different god. Those who want to worship Venus are not forced to live by the standards of those who worship Mars.

Lots of gods - bearded dude up in the sky with a whole bunch of lesser gods

This advantage allows a political structure that is not limited by a single religious practice to spread across unrelated cultures, adopting their gods into the pantheon of the rulers. This was part of what allowed the Roman Empire to spread so successfully, bringing the worship of Isis in to Rome as well as the worship of Jupiter out to conquered provinces. The decline and fall of the Roman Empire is connected to the replacement of polytheism by monotheism, as Gibbon pointed out.

Polytheism is not all peace and love, however. Where there is no consensus on correct social norms, war cults will want to act in a warlike fashion. Male-only cults will make life hard for women. Patrician cults will formalize aristocracy and slavery.

Mono- or poly-, it’s the theism that is the problem. Matthew, in The Gospel According to the Romans, is an interested but skeptical observer of the religions swirling around the Roman Empire.

3 comments on “Monotheism and Polytheism – pros and cons

  1. shekhynah says:

    Interesting article. I’ve been searching the web for articles that discuss the correlation between monotheism vs polytheism and political structure. We live in a very hypocritical society that asserts one belief…. but behaves an entirely different way. I’ve touched on some of the same topics from a faith based perspective. http://shekhynah.wordpress.com/2014/07/28/6/

    Like

    • Shekhynah, I enjoyed the blog meditations you mention, although I’m not a believer, of course. Regarding your discussion on “agreeing to disagree”, there’s a 19th century English cartoon that I love, of people at a formal dinner party. The conversation goes:
      She: “And what is your religion, sir?”
      He: “Madam, all men of sense are of the same religion.”
      She: “And which religion is that, pray tell?”
      He: “Madam, men of sense never say.”

      Like

  2. Bruno says:

    Humans have invented thousands of Gods. Since there might be a billion “Earths” all over the universe with sentient beings, the number of Gods in the universe is mind boggling. I’m a fan of the First Ammendment so I deem “The more the Merrier!” I believe that all Gods were created equal. However, they must all “live and let live” to enjoy the rights given by the First Ammendment。Any God that interferes with the rights of others should be terminated!

    Like

Leave a Reply here!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.